Verdict
An open-licence, self-hosted DAM for teams with in-house server admin capability, trading a free licence for the time to run upgrades, tune dependencies and troubleshoot it themselves.
A cloud portfolio and image-storage platform for individual photographers, with client galleries and built-in print/licensing sales.
A cloud asset library for small-to-mid ecommerce and DTC brands, priced as a flat monthly fee with unlimited users, tiered by storage and downloads.
A self-hosted file-sync and collaboration platform some organisations stretch into asset-library duty; tagging, batch metadata editing and dynamic tag-based collections are still limited or missing.
Price published
No
No
Yes
Yes
Billed on
Self-hosted: no licence fee. Hosted: a user ceiling per tier
Quote-only. Priced per named "Library Seat" (2-5 seats depending on tier, custom for Enterprise) plus a storage allotment per tier (1TB-5TB, custom for Enterprise) and a cap on "Advanced Integrations" (0 to unlimited). Unlimited invited/contributor users and unlimited Social Content Publisher seats included on all/most tiers. Annual or monthly billing toggle shown on the pricing page, but no dollar amounts are published — all tiers show a "Get Pricing" CTA to a demo/sales call.
Flat price per account; users are unlimited, tier set by storage and downloads
Subscription per user per year, cheaper at volume
Deployment
Cloud, On-premise
Cloud
Cloud
On-premise, Cloud
Free plan
Yes
No
No
Yes
Free trial
No
No
No
No
Transparency index
60%
Not checked
60%
80%
Most common complaint
The free route is genuinely free of licence fees but moves hosting, upgrades and support onto you
Not checked
The tier is capped by download count as well as volume, which is a less familiar unit to budget against
It is a file platform with DAM features rather than a DAM: asset-level metadata and rights are thinner