PicaJet

File Formats

Image file formats determine what a DAM can actually do with a file the moment it lands: whether it can generate a thumbnail without a plugin, whether the metadata survives an export, and whether the file is safe to keep as the long-term master or needs converting first. The extension alone doesn’t answer that — a TIFF from a scanner and a TIFF exported with sixty Photoshop layers behave nothing alike inside a library.

This section covers each format the way it actually shows up in a media library: what’s inside the container, which tools genuinely open it, and whether archival advice is “keep as-is” or “convert now, before the software that reads it natively disappears.” It spans photography (JPEG, RAW, TIFF), video and audio codecs, print and document formats, 3D and CAD, fonts, and GIS — because a DAM built for one media type eventually has to ingest the others anyway.

Frequently asked

Why does a DAM need to know about file formats at all — isn't storage just storage?

Storage is the easy part. Search, preview generation, and long-term readability all depend on the format: a DAM can't build a thumbnail for a format its rendering engine doesn't understand, can't index metadata a format doesn't carry, and can't guarantee a file opens in ten years if the only software that reads it has been discontinued.

Which formats should a DAM keep as the permanent master, and which are safe to regenerate?

The rule of thumb: keep formats that are open, well-documented, and widely supported (TIFF, PDF/A, DNG, WAV/FLAC, IFC) as masters, and treat anything a delivery pipeline can regenerate on demand — a resized JPEG, a transcoded MP4 proxy, a contact-sheet PDF — as disposable. Each format entry's "archive advice" states which side of that line it falls on.

Why do some formats need proprietary software to open, and is that a real risk?

Camera RAW formats (CR2, NEF, ARW) and design-native files (INDD, PSD with live effects, C4D) are real risks specifically because they depend on one vendor's current software. If that vendor discontinues support or the file predates a compatibility cutoff, the asset becomes unreadable — which is exactly why formats like DNG and IDML exist as open, interchange-friendly alternatives.

Does converting a file to a more common format lose anything?

It can — compression artifacts on a lossy re-encode, dropped metadata fields a converter doesn't recognize, or discarded layers/vector data when flattening to a raster format. Each entry's "container notes" section states specifically what a given format can and can't carry, so a conversion decision can be made with that loss made explicit rather than discovered later.

How current is the information on browser and software support?

Format support — especially for newer codecs like AVIF, JPEG XL, and AV1 — changes as browsers and operating systems update. Each entry carries a checked date, and claims about current support status are attributed rather than stated as permanent fact, since this is exactly the kind of detail that goes stale fastest.

What's the difference between a format and a codec?

A container format (MP4, MOV, MKV) defines how audio, video, and metadata streams are packaged together; a codec (H.264, AV1, ProRes) defines how the actual video or audio data inside is compressed. The same container can hold different codecs, which is why "what plays this file" sometimes depends on the codec inside, not just the file extension.

Why are so many niche formats — GIS shapefiles, BIM files, film scan formats — included here?

Because DAM isn't only marketing photography. Architecture and engineering firms manage IFC and RVT files, GIS teams manage Shapefiles and GeoTIFFs, and post-production houses manage DPX sequences — each with its own preview, metadata, and archival questions that a generic "how to store images" guide doesn't answer.

Is a format's age a good indicator of whether it's safe to archive?

Not on its own. Some old formats (TIFF, WAV) remain excellent archival choices because they're open and universally supported; some newer formats (a proprietary camera RAW variant) are already a preservation risk because only one company's current software reads them. Openness and documentation matter more than age.

What should I do if a format I'm dealing with isn't listed here yet?

This reference grows from the formats DAM buyers and practitioners actually run into, so gaps are expected rather than exhaustive from day one. In the meantime, checking whether the format has an open, published specification (versus a closed, vendor-only one) is the single most useful thing to establish before deciding how to store it.

How is this different from a generic "list of file extensions" page?

A generic extension list tells you what a format is called. This tells you what it means for a media library specifically: whether it survives a re-export, what a DAM can preview without a plugin, and what a practitioner should actually do with a file in that format today.

Reports in this section

All 155 reports in this section.