Verdict
An on-prem, cloud or hybrid DAM aimed at likely DACH-region enterprise manufacturers who need to keep data in-house, with a public review record too thin to lean on without running your own trial.
A cloud portfolio and image-storage platform for individual photographers, with client galleries and built-in print/licensing sales.
An open-licence, self-hosted DAM for teams with in-house server admin capability, trading a free licence for the time to run upgrades, tune dependencies and troubleshoot it themselves.
A self-hosted file-sync and collaboration platform some organisations stretch into asset-library duty; tagging, batch metadata editing and dynamic tag-based collections are still limited or missing.
Price published
No
No
No
Yes
Billed on
Quoted per customer
Quote-only. Priced per named "Library Seat" (2-5 seats depending on tier, custom for Enterprise) plus a storage allotment per tier (1TB-5TB, custom for Enterprise) and a cap on "Advanced Integrations" (0 to unlimited). Unlimited invited/contributor users and unlimited Social Content Publisher seats included on all/most tiers. Annual or monthly billing toggle shown on the pricing page, but no dollar amounts are published — all tiers show a "Get Pricing" CTA to a demo/sales call.
Self-hosted: no licence fee. Hosted: a user ceiling per tier
Subscription per user per year, cheaper at volume
Deployment
On-premise, Cloud, Hybrid
Cloud
Cloud, On-premise
On-premise, Cloud
Free plan
No
No
Yes
Yes
Free trial
No
No
No
No
Transparency index
20%
Not checked
60%
80%
Most common complaint
No prices, though it does name three deployment models including fully managed on-premise
Not checked
The free route is genuinely free of licence fees but moves hosting, upgrades and support onto you
It is a file platform with DAM features rather than a DAM: asset-level metadata and rights are thinner