Verdict
A self-hosted, permission-based photo/video catalog with album hierarchies, tagging and a large plugin ecosystem, for archives and small orgs willing to maintain their own server as the library grows.
An enterprise digital asset management platform for newsrooms, publishers, museums, agencies, and manufacturers to organize and distribute digital assets.
A digital asset management platform for enterprises, agencies, museums, and nonprofits, paired with in-house consulting and data-migration services.
A self-hosted file-sync and collaboration platform some organisations stretch into asset-library duty; tagging, batch metadata editing and dynamic tag-based collections are still limited or missing.
Price published
Yes
No
No
Yes
Billed on
Flat price per account by storage; users are unlimited
Not disclosed publicly. Pricing page shows three tiers (Starter, Advanced, Ultimate) all gated behind "Request a quote", billed annually; no per-user, per-GB, or credit figures are shown, so the actual billing unit cannot be confirmed from the vendor's site.
Not disclosed publicly. Plans are differentiated by number of admin users, storage (TB), and number of portals (e.g. Essential: 5 admin users/1TB; Signature: 20 admin users/2TB/3 portals; Premium: 50 admin users/5TB/5 portals); exact per-unit or per-tier prices are not published, visitors must request a consult.
Subscription per user per year, cheaper at volume
Deployment
On-premise, Cloud
Cloud, On-premise
Cloud, On-premise, Hybrid
On-premise, Cloud
Free plan
Yes
No
No
Yes
Free trial
Yes
No
No
No
Transparency index
100%
Not checked
Not checked
80%
Most common complaint
A ten per cent price rise is announced for 1 September 2026
Not checked
Not checked
It is a file platform with DAM features rather than a DAM: asset-level metadata and rights are thinner