Verdict
An open-source PHP/Symfony platform unifying PIM, DAM, CMS and MDM on one codebase, for teams with in-house developers or an integrator partner rather than a marketing team wanting to self-serve.
A self-hosted file-sync and collaboration platform some organisations stretch into asset-library duty; tagging, batch metadata editing and dynamic tag-based collections are still limited or missing.
A cloud portfolio and image-storage platform for individual photographers, with client galleries and built-in print/licensing sales.
An image and video CDN with an API-first asset library, built for fast developer integration, billed on flat monthly tiers with per-GB overage once bandwidth or storage limits are exceeded.
Price published
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Billed on
Annual licence per edition, not per user
Subscription per user per year, cheaper at volume
Quote-only. Priced per named "Library Seat" (2-5 seats depending on tier, custom for Enterprise) plus a storage allotment per tier (1TB-5TB, custom for Enterprise) and a cap on "Advanced Integrations" (0 to unlimited). Unlimited invited/contributor users and unlimited Social Content Publisher seats included on all/most tiers. Annual or monthly billing toggle shown on the pricing page, but no dollar amounts are published — all tiers show a "Get Pricing" CTA to a demo/sales call.
Bandwidth, storage and user seats, with published per-unit rates above the limits
Deployment
On-premise, Cloud
On-premise, Cloud
Cloud
Cloud
Free plan
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Free trial
No
No
No
Yes
Transparency index
100%
80%
Not checked
70%
Most common complaint
It is a broader platform than a DAM — some capability has to be built rather than switched on
It is a file platform with DAM features rather than a DAM: asset-level metadata and rights are thinner
Not checked
Several units are metered at once: bandwidth, storage, video units and seats