Verdict
A cloud portfolio and image-storage platform for individual photographers, with client galleries and built-in print/licensing sales.
A developer-facing image and video transformation API and CDN, billed from one pooled credit balance covering storage, transformations and bandwidth together.
A developer-first file upload and CDN/media-processing API for apps, pitched as a lighter, faster-to-integrate alternative to Cloudinary for teams that don't need its full DAM/video/AI stack.
A self-hosted file-sync and collaboration platform some organisations stretch into asset-library duty; tagging, batch metadata editing and dynamic tag-based collections are still limited or missing.
Price published
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Billed on
Quote-only. Priced per named "Library Seat" (2-5 seats depending on tier, custom for Enterprise) plus a storage allotment per tier (1TB-5TB, custom for Enterprise) and a cap on "Advanced Integrations" (0 to unlimited). Unlimited invited/contributor users and unlimited Social Content Publisher seats included on all/most tiers. Annual or monthly billing toggle shown on the pricing page, but no dollar amounts are published — all tiers show a "Get Pricing" CTA to a demo/sales call.
Credits: one credit is 1,000 transformations, or 1 GB of storage, or 1 GB of video bandwidth
Operations, traffic and storage, with published overage rates
Subscription per user per year, cheaper at volume
Deployment
Cloud
Cloud
Cloud
On-premise, Cloud
Free plan
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Free trial
No
Yes
No
No
Transparency index
Not checked
60%
70%
80%
Most common complaint
Not checked
Prices are published for the API but not for the DAM, so the product being compared with a DAM still has no price
The free tier is stated as personal use only
It is a file platform with DAM features rather than a DAM: asset-level metadata and rights are thinner