Verdict
A self-hosted, single-container photo indexer under AGPL/commercial licensing, for people who want a private on-hardware archive without Google-Photos-level AI tagging or mobile app polish.
An image and video API for real-time resizing, compression, and format conversion via URL parameters, built for developers at ecommerce, media, and agency teams.
A self-hosted file-sync and collaboration platform some organisations stretch into asset-library duty; tagging, batch metadata editing and dynamic tag-based collections are still limited or missing.
A brand-management platform built around a single, always-current source of truth for guidelines, logos and templates, aimed at brand teams working with internal staff and external agencies.
Price published
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Billed on
Subscription per edition, billed annually
Consumption-based credits, sold in monthly tiers ($25–$500/mo self-serve, custom above that). Credits are spent on Management (2 credits/GB/month for stored assets), Delivery (1 credit/GB bandwidth), and Transformation (variable by operation). Per-credit rate drops as plan tier rises ($0.25 down to $0.12, monthly billing; slightly cheaper on annual commitment). Each plan also states an implied storage/bandwidth cap in GB.
Subscription per user per year, cheaper at volume
Monthly active users
Deployment
On-premise, Cloud
Cloud
On-premise, Cloud
Cloud
Free plan
Yes
No
Yes
No
Free trial
No
No
No
No
Transparency index
100%
Not checked
80%
30%
Most common complaint
The gap between the free edition and the first paid one is wide: €200 a month
Not checked
It is a file platform with DAM features rather than a DAM: asset-level metadata and rights are thinner
The MAU model favours occasional users, but there is no figure to verify that with