Verdict
A self-hosted, single-container photo indexer under AGPL/commercial licensing, for people who want a private on-hardware archive without Google-Photos-level AI tagging or mobile app polish.
A PIM platform with a built-in DAM module, used by manufacturing and ecommerce companies to manage product data and assets; also available as a free open-source Community Edition.
A self-hosted file-sync and collaboration platform some organisations stretch into asset-library duty; tagging, batch metadata editing and dynamic tag-based collections are still limited or missing.
A combined creative-operations platform pairing brand-portal DAM with proofing and approval workflows, for in-house teams that want both under one roof rather than a DAM-only search specialist.
Price published
Yes
No
Yes
No
Billed on
Subscription per edition, billed annually
No genuine dollar pricing is published. The vendor's package-comparison page lists four tiers: Community Edition (free, open-source, self-hosted), Growth (SaaS, shown only as "Starting at $0 Annually" with a free-trial CTA — no real recurring price disclosed), Advanced and Premium (both "Call for a quote"). No billing unit (per user, per SKU, per asset, per GB) is stated anywhere on the site for the paid tiers.
Subscription per user per year, cheaper at volume
Team size, product mix and configuration
Deployment
On-premise, Cloud
Cloud, On-premise
On-premise, Cloud
Cloud
Free plan
Yes
No
Yes
No
Free trial
No
No
No
No
Transparency index
100%
Not checked
80%
10%
Most common complaint
The gap between the free edition and the first paid one is wide: €200 a month
Not checked
It is a file platform with DAM features rather than a DAM: asset-level metadata and rights are thinner
The tiers are named but cannot be compared on cost