Verdict
A self-hosted file-sync and collaboration platform some organisations stretch into asset-library duty; tagging, batch metadata editing and dynamic tag-based collections are still limited or missing.
An open-source PHP/Symfony platform unifying PIM, DAM, CMS and MDM on one codebase, for teams with in-house developers or an integrator partner rather than a marketing team wanting to self-serve.
A cloud portfolio and image-storage platform for individual photographers, with client galleries and built-in print/licensing sales.
A brand-management platform built around a single, always-current source of truth for guidelines, logos and templates, aimed at brand teams working with internal staff and external agencies.
Price published
Yes
Yes
No
No
Billed on
Subscription per user per year, cheaper at volume
Annual licence per edition, not per user
Quote-only. Priced per named "Library Seat" (2-5 seats depending on tier, custom for Enterprise) plus a storage allotment per tier (1TB-5TB, custom for Enterprise) and a cap on "Advanced Integrations" (0 to unlimited). Unlimited invited/contributor users and unlimited Social Content Publisher seats included on all/most tiers. Annual or monthly billing toggle shown on the pricing page, but no dollar amounts are published — all tiers show a "Get Pricing" CTA to a demo/sales call.
Monthly active users
Deployment
On-premise, Cloud
On-premise, Cloud
Cloud
Cloud
Free plan
Yes
Yes
No
No
Free trial
No
No
No
No
Transparency index
80%
100%
Not checked
30%
Most common complaint
It is a file platform with DAM features rather than a DAM: asset-level metadata and rights are thinner
It is a broader platform than a DAM — some capability has to be built rather than switched on
Not checked
The MAU model favours occasional users, but there is no figure to verify that with