Verdict
A self-hosted file-sync and collaboration platform some organisations stretch into asset-library duty; tagging, batch metadata editing and dynamic tag-based collections are still limited or missing.
A cloud portfolio and image-storage platform for individual photographers, with client galleries and built-in print/licensing sales.
A self-hosted, permission-based photo/video catalog with album hierarchies, tagging and a large plugin ecosystem, for archives and small orgs willing to maintain their own server as the library grows.
A Windows-only photo cataloging tool for large image libraries (50,000+ files), built by a single developer, sold as a one-time perpetual licence instead of a subscription.
Price published
Yes
No
Yes
No
Billed on
Subscription per user per year, cheaper at volume
Quote-only. Priced per named "Library Seat" (2-5 seats depending on tier, custom for Enterprise) plus a storage allotment per tier (1TB-5TB, custom for Enterprise) and a cap on "Advanced Integrations" (0 to unlimited). Unlimited invited/contributor users and unlimited Social Content Publisher seats included on all/most tiers. Annual or monthly billing toggle shown on the pricing page, but no dollar amounts are published — all tiers show a "Get Pricing" CTA to a demo/sales call.
Flat price per account by storage; users are unlimited
Perpetual licence, no subscription
Deployment
On-premise, Cloud
Cloud
On-premise, Cloud
On-premise
Free plan
Yes
No
Yes
No
Free trial
No
No
Yes
Yes
Transparency index
80%
Not checked
100%
60%
Most common complaint
It is a file platform with DAM features rather than a DAM: asset-level metadata and rights are thinner
Not checked
A ten per cent price rise is announced for 1 September 2026
Windows only, so it is out of the question for a team on Macs