Verdict
A self-hosted file-sync and collaboration platform some organisations stretch into asset-library duty; tagging, batch metadata editing and dynamic tag-based collections are still limited or missing.
A cloud portfolio and image-storage platform for individual photographers, with client galleries and built-in print/licensing sales.
A combined creative-operations platform pairing brand-portal DAM with proofing and approval workflows, for in-house teams that want both under one roof rather than a DAM-only search specialist.
An on-prem, cloud or hybrid DAM aimed at likely DACH-region enterprise manufacturers who need to keep data in-house, with a public review record too thin to lean on without running your own trial.
Price published
Yes
No
No
No
Billed on
Subscription per user per year, cheaper at volume
Quote-only. Priced per named "Library Seat" (2-5 seats depending on tier, custom for Enterprise) plus a storage allotment per tier (1TB-5TB, custom for Enterprise) and a cap on "Advanced Integrations" (0 to unlimited). Unlimited invited/contributor users and unlimited Social Content Publisher seats included on all/most tiers. Annual or monthly billing toggle shown on the pricing page, but no dollar amounts are published — all tiers show a "Get Pricing" CTA to a demo/sales call.
Team size, product mix and configuration
Quoted per customer
Deployment
On-premise, Cloud
Cloud
Cloud
On-premise, Cloud, Hybrid
Free plan
Yes
No
No
No
Free trial
No
No
No
No
Transparency index
80%
Not checked
10%
20%
Most common complaint
It is a file platform with DAM features rather than a DAM: asset-level metadata and rights are thinner
Not checked
The tiers are named but cannot be compared on cost
No prices, though it does name three deployment models including fully managed on-premise