Verdict
A self-hosted file-sync and collaboration platform some organisations stretch into asset-library duty; tagging, batch metadata editing and dynamic tag-based collections are still limited or missing.
A DAM built around search and tagging for mid-market teams, with unlimited free view-only accounts but per-seat pricing for editors that only appears after a sales quote.
A cloud portfolio and image-storage platform for individual photographers, with client galleries and built-in print/licensing sales.
An open-licence, self-hosted DAM for teams with in-house server admin capability, trading a free licence for the time to run upgrades, tune dependencies and troubleshoot it themselves.
Price published
Yes
No
No
No
Billed on
Subscription per user per year, cheaper at volume
Team size and storage volume
Quote-only. Priced per named "Library Seat" (2-5 seats depending on tier, custom for Enterprise) plus a storage allotment per tier (1TB-5TB, custom for Enterprise) and a cap on "Advanced Integrations" (0 to unlimited). Unlimited invited/contributor users and unlimited Social Content Publisher seats included on all/most tiers. Annual or monthly billing toggle shown on the pricing page, but no dollar amounts are published — all tiers show a "Get Pricing" CTA to a demo/sales call.
Self-hosted: no licence fee. Hosted: a user ceiling per tier
Deployment
On-premise, Cloud
Cloud
Cloud
Cloud, On-premise
Free plan
Yes
No
No
Yes
Free trial
No
Yes
No
No
Transparency index
80%
20%
Not checked
60%
Most common complaint
It is a file platform with DAM features rather than a DAM: asset-level metadata and rights are thinner
The tiers are named and described but cannot be compared on cost
Not checked
The free route is genuinely free of licence fees but moves hosting, upgrades and support onto you