Verdict
A cloud DAM billed by storage and configuration rather than seat count, aimed at agencies and distributed marketing teams with large or growing user bases where per-seat pricing would balloon.
A flat-fee-per-account DAM and MAM with a free 500GB/5-user tier and unlimited paid users, for teams willing to pilot without much recent independent review evidence.
A digital asset management platform for enterprises, agencies, museums, and nonprofits, paired with in-house consulting and data-migration services.
A self-hosted file-sync and collaboration platform some organisations stretch into asset-library duty; tagging, batch metadata editing and dynamic tag-based collections are still limited or missing.
Price published
No
Yes
No
Yes
Billed on
Not per user — the vendor states unlimited users and permission groups
Flat price per account by volume; the vendor states there are no per-user fees
Not disclosed publicly. Plans are differentiated by number of admin users, storage (TB), and number of portals (e.g. Essential: 5 admin users/1TB; Signature: 20 admin users/2TB/3 portals; Premium: 50 admin users/5TB/5 portals); exact per-unit or per-tier prices are not published, visitors must request a consult.
Subscription per user per year, cheaper at volume
Deployment
Cloud
Cloud, On-premise
Cloud, On-premise, Hybrid
On-premise, Cloud
Free plan
No
Yes
No
Yes
Free trial
No
Yes
No
No
Transparency index
20%
90%
Not checked
80%
Most common complaint
The promise not to charge per user is prominent, but there is no figure to compare it against
On-premise is available only in the enterprise tier, whose price is not published
Not checked
It is a file platform with DAM features rather than a DAM: asset-level metadata and rights are thinner