Verdict
An image and video CDN with an API-first asset library, built for fast developer integration, billed on flat monthly tiers with per-GB overage once bandwidth or storage limits are exceeded.
An open-source PHP/Symfony platform unifying PIM, DAM, CMS and MDM on one codebase, for teams with in-house developers or an integrator partner rather than a marketing team wanting to self-serve.
A cloud portfolio and image-storage platform for individual photographers, with client galleries and built-in print/licensing sales.
A self-hosted file-sync and collaboration platform some organisations stretch into asset-library duty; tagging, batch metadata editing and dynamic tag-based collections are still limited or missing.
Price published
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Billed on
Bandwidth, storage and user seats, with published per-unit rates above the limits
Annual licence per edition, not per user
Quote-only. Priced per named "Library Seat" (2-5 seats depending on tier, custom for Enterprise) plus a storage allotment per tier (1TB-5TB, custom for Enterprise) and a cap on "Advanced Integrations" (0 to unlimited). Unlimited invited/contributor users and unlimited Social Content Publisher seats included on all/most tiers. Annual or monthly billing toggle shown on the pricing page, but no dollar amounts are published — all tiers show a "Get Pricing" CTA to a demo/sales call.
Subscription per user per year, cheaper at volume
Deployment
Cloud
On-premise, Cloud
Cloud
On-premise, Cloud
Free plan
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Free trial
Yes
No
No
No
Transparency index
70%
100%
Not checked
80%
Most common complaint
Several units are metered at once: bandwidth, storage, video units and seats
It is a broader platform than a DAM — some capability has to be built rather than switched on
Not checked
It is a file platform with DAM features rather than a DAM: asset-level metadata and rights are thinner