Verdict
A DAM built around search and tagging for mid-market teams, with unlimited free view-only accounts but per-seat pricing for editors that only appears after a sales quote.
A self-hosted file-sync and collaboration platform some organisations stretch into asset-library duty; tagging, batch metadata editing and dynamic tag-based collections are still limited or missing.
A cloud portfolio and image-storage platform for individual photographers, with client galleries and built-in print/licensing sales.
A product experience management (PXM) platform for brands and manufacturers that centralizes and syndicates product data to retail and ecommerce channels.
Price published
No
Yes
No
No
Billed on
Team size and storage volume
Subscription per user per year, cheaper at volume
Quote-only. Priced per named "Library Seat" (2-5 seats depending on tier, custom for Enterprise) plus a storage allotment per tier (1TB-5TB, custom for Enterprise) and a cap on "Advanced Integrations" (0 to unlimited). Unlimited invited/contributor users and unlimited Social Content Publisher seats included on all/most tiers. Annual or monthly billing toggle shown on the pricing page, but no dollar amounts are published — all tiers show a "Get Pricing" CTA to a demo/sales call.
Not disclosed publicly — pricing page routes to Request Demo / Contact Sales only, no tiers, per-SKU/per-user/per-asset pricing, or plan names shown
Deployment
Cloud
On-premise, Cloud
Cloud
Cloud
Free plan
No
Yes
No
No
Free trial
Yes
No
No
No
Transparency index
20%
80%
Not checked
Not checked
Most common complaint
The tiers are named and described but cannot be compared on cost
It is a file platform with DAM features rather than a DAM: asset-level metadata and rights are thinner
Not checked
Not checked