Verdict
A brand-guidelines and asset portal for mid-market marketing teams, with a genuine free tier that covers a branded guidelines page but not the full asset library or workflow tools.
A PIM platform with a built-in DAM module, used by manufacturing and ecommerce companies to manage product data and assets; also available as a free open-source Community Edition.
A cloud DAM billed by storage and configuration rather than seat count, aimed at agencies and distributed marketing teams with large or growing user bases where per-seat pricing would balloon.
A self-hosted file-sync and collaboration platform some organisations stretch into asset-library duty; tagging, batch metadata editing and dynamic tag-based collections are still limited or missing.
Price published
No
No
No
Yes
Billed on
Number of users and the tier selected
No genuine dollar pricing is published. The vendor's package-comparison page lists four tiers: Community Edition (free, open-source, self-hosted), Growth (SaaS, shown only as "Starting at $0 Annually" with a free-trial CTA — no real recurring price disclosed), Advanced and Premium (both "Call for a quote"). No billing unit (per user, per SKU, per asset, per GB) is stated anywhere on the site for the paid tiers.
Not per user — the vendor states unlimited users and permission groups
Subscription per user per year, cheaper at volume
Deployment
Cloud
Cloud, On-premise
Cloud
On-premise, Cloud
Free plan
Yes
No
No
Yes
Free trial
No
No
No
No
Transparency index
40%
Not checked
20%
80%
Most common complaint
The free tier is named while the cost of the next step is not
Not checked
The promise not to charge per user is prominent, but there is no figure to compare it against
It is a file platform with DAM features rather than a DAM: asset-level metadata and rights are thinner