Verdict
A visually organized, board-based DAM for photo/image-heavy creative and marketing teams, with a genuinely usable free tier and a history of shifting, steep paid-tier pricing.
A peer-to-device photo sync and library tool for individuals and families with photos spread across computers, phones and tablets who want them synced without uploading to a public cloud.
An image and video API for real-time resizing, compression, and format conversion via URL parameters, built for developers at ecommerce, media, and agency teams.
A self-hosted file-sync and collaboration platform some organisations stretch into asset-library duty; tagging, batch metadata editing and dynamic tag-based collections are still limited or missing.
Price published
No
No
Yes
Yes
Billed on
Credits; users are not billed
Personal, Family and Business plans; no amounts on the page
Consumption-based credits, sold in monthly tiers ($25–$500/mo self-serve, custom above that). Credits are spent on Management (2 credits/GB/month for stored assets), Delivery (1 credit/GB bandwidth), and Transformation (variable by operation). Per-credit rate drops as plan tier rises ($0.25 down to $0.12, monthly billing; slightly cheaper on annual commitment). Each plan also states an implied storage/bandwidth cap in GB.
Subscription per user per year, cheaper at volume
Deployment
Cloud
On-premise, Cloud
Cloud
On-premise, Cloud
Free plan
Yes
No
No
Yes
Free trial
Yes
Yes
No
No
Transparency index
60%
50%
Not checked
80%
Most common complaint
The free tier is described in detail while the paid tiers are named only
Three plans are named and none is priced on the pricing page
Not checked
It is a file platform with DAM features rather than a DAM: asset-level metadata and rights are thinner