PicaJet

Platform finder

Find a DAM platform

Every platform below was checked on the vendor’s own pages, not on an aggregator. Filter by what you actually need — the type of system, the sector you work in, the features you cannot do without — and the list narrows. Conditions combine with AND, so each one you add cuts the list rather than growing it.

5 platforms of 67 match

Cloudinary

A developer-facing image and video transformation API and CDN, billed from one pooled credit balance covering storage, transformations and bandwidth together.

Price published
Yes
Billed by
Credits: one credit is 1,000 transformations, or 1 GB of storage, or 1 GB of video bandwidth
Transparency
60%

Filecamp

A team file library billed as a flat monthly fee with unlimited users, aimed at organisations where most people only need to download an approved file a few times a month.

Price published
Yes
Billed by
Flat price per account — users are not a billing unit
Transparency
70%

+ Price is published in full — three tiers with monthly and annual figures, rare in this market − Storage ceilings are modest — 20/50/100 GB, so video libraries outgrow the tiers quickly

ImageKit

An image and video CDN with an API-first asset library, built for fast developer integration, billed on flat monthly tiers with per-GB overage once bandwidth or storage limits are exceeded.

Price published
Yes
Billed by
Bandwidth, storage and user seats, with published per-unit rates above the limits
Transparency
70%

Piwigo

A self-hosted, permission-based photo/video catalog with album hierarchies, tagging and a large plugin ecosystem, for archives and small orgs willing to maintain their own server as the library grows.

Price published
Yes
Billed by
Flat price per account by storage; users are unlimited
Transparency
100%

Razuna

A flat-fee-per-account DAM and MAM with a free 500GB/5-user tier and unlimited paid users, for teams willing to pilot without much recent independent review evidence.

Price published
Yes
Billed by
Flat price per account by volume; the vendor states there are no per-user fees
Transparency
90%