Verdict
An open-licence, self-hosted DAM for teams with in-house server admin capability, trading a free licence for the time to run upgrades, tune dependencies and troubleshoot it themselves.
An on-prem, cloud or hybrid DAM aimed at likely DACH-region enterprise manufacturers who need to keep data in-house, with a public review record too thin to lean on without running your own trial.
A cloud portfolio and image-storage platform for individual photographers, with client galleries and built-in print/licensing sales.
A developer-facing image and video transformation API and CDN, billed from one pooled credit balance covering storage, transformations and bandwidth together.
Price published
No
No
No
Yes
Billed on
Self-hosted: no licence fee. Hosted: a user ceiling per tier
Quoted per customer
Quote-only. Priced per named "Library Seat" (2-5 seats depending on tier, custom for Enterprise) plus a storage allotment per tier (1TB-5TB, custom for Enterprise) and a cap on "Advanced Integrations" (0 to unlimited). Unlimited invited/contributor users and unlimited Social Content Publisher seats included on all/most tiers. Annual or monthly billing toggle shown on the pricing page, but no dollar amounts are published — all tiers show a "Get Pricing" CTA to a demo/sales call.
Credits: one credit is 1,000 transformations, or 1 GB of storage, or 1 GB of video bandwidth
Deployment
Cloud, On-premise
On-premise, Cloud, Hybrid
Cloud
Cloud
Free plan
Yes
No
No
Yes
Free trial
No
No
No
Yes
Transparency index
60%
20%
Not checked
60%
Most common complaint
The free route is genuinely free of licence fees but moves hosting, upgrades and support onto you
No prices, though it does name three deployment models including fully managed on-premise
Not checked
Prices are published for the API but not for the DAM, so the product being compared with a DAM still has no price