Verdict
An open-licence, self-hosted DAM for teams with in-house server admin capability, trading a free licence for the time to run upgrades, tune dependencies and troubleshoot it themselves.
A cloud portfolio and image-storage platform for individual photographers, with client galleries and built-in print/licensing sales.
A file-processing API that handles uploading, transforming, and delivering video, audio, images, and documents, for developers who'd otherwise build that infrastructure in-house.
A Windows-only photo cataloging tool for large image libraries (50,000+ files), built by a single developer, sold as a one-time perpetual licence instead of a subscription.
Price published
No
No
Yes
No
Billed on
Self-hosted: no licence fee. Hosted: a user ceiling per tier
Quote-only. Priced per named "Library Seat" (2-5 seats depending on tier, custom for Enterprise) plus a storage allotment per tier (1TB-5TB, custom for Enterprise) and a cap on "Advanced Integrations" (0 to unlimited). Unlimited invited/contributor users and unlimited Social Content Publisher seats included on all/most tiers. Annual or monthly billing toggle shown on the pricing page, but no dollar amounts are published — all tiers show a "Get Pricing" CTA to a demo/sales call.
GB of data processed per month (combined input + output file size); paid tiers also gate priority processing slots, collaborator seats, and max file size. Overage on the paid Startup tier billed at $1.80/GB. Enterprise tier is custom/quote-based tiered pricing with whitelabeling.
Perpetual licence, no subscription
Deployment
Cloud, On-premise
Cloud
Cloud
On-premise
Free plan
Yes
No
No
No
Free trial
No
No
No
Yes
Transparency index
60%
Not checked
Not checked
60%
Most common complaint
The free route is genuinely free of licence fees but moves hosting, upgrades and support onto you
Not checked
Not checked
Windows only, so it is out of the question for a team on Macs