PicaJet

Razuna, Nextcloud, ResourceSpace, Pixelboxx

Side by side on what we have verified on each vendor’s own pages. Where a fact was not checked, the table says so rather than leaving a blank that reads as “no”.

What decides it · Publishes a price

One of these tells you the order of magnitude before you speak to anyone, and the others do not. That difference sets how long your evaluation takes, whatever the software does.

Razuna

Yes

Nextcloud

Yes

ResourceSpace

No

Pixelboxx

No

Everything else

Verdict
A flat-fee-per-account DAM and MAM with a free 500GB/5-user tier and unlimited paid users, for teams willing to pilot without much recent independent review evidence.
A self-hosted file-sync and collaboration platform some organisations stretch into asset-library duty; tagging, batch metadata editing and dynamic tag-based collections are still limited or missing.
An open-licence, self-hosted DAM for teams with in-house server admin capability, trading a free licence for the time to run upgrades, tune dependencies and troubleshoot it themselves.
An on-prem, cloud or hybrid DAM aimed at likely DACH-region enterprise manufacturers who need to keep data in-house, with a public review record too thin to lean on without running your own trial.
Price published
Yes
Yes
No
No
Billed on
Flat price per account by volume; the vendor states there are no per-user fees
Subscription per user per year, cheaper at volume
Self-hosted: no licence fee. Hosted: a user ceiling per tier
Quoted per customer
Deployment
Cloud, On-premise
On-premise, Cloud
Cloud, On-premise
On-premise, Cloud, Hybrid
Free plan
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Free trial
Yes
No
No
No
Transparency index
90%
80%
60%
20%
Most common complaint
On-premise is available only in the enterprise tier, whose price is not published
It is a file platform with DAM features rather than a DAM: asset-level metadata and rights are thinner
The free route is genuinely free of licence fees but moves hosting, upgrades and support onto you
No prices, though it does name three deployment models including fully managed on-premise

“Not checked” means exactly that: we have not verified it, not that the platform lacks it. Every other value was read off the vendor’s own pages on the date shown on each platform page.

What to ask on the demo

One question per platform, drawn from what actually goes wrong with it — not a generic checklist. Vendors run the demo; this hands the agenda back to you.

Razuna On-premise is available only in the enterprise tier, whose price is not published — ask them to answer this in writing before the trial.
Nextcloud It is a file platform with DAM features rather than a DAM: asset-level metadata and rights are thinner — ask them to answer this in writing before the trial.
ResourceSpace The free route is genuinely free of licence fees but moves hosting, upgrades and support onto you — ask them to answer this in writing before the trial.
Pixelboxx No prices, though it does name three deployment models including fully managed on-premise — ask them to answer this in writing before the trial.

No email required — the page prints as it stands.