Verdict
A self-hosted, permission-based photo/video catalog with album hierarchies, tagging and a large plugin ecosystem, for archives and small orgs willing to maintain their own server as the library grows.
A flat-fee-per-account DAM and MAM with a free 500GB/5-user tier and unlimited paid users, for teams willing to pilot without much recent independent review evidence.
An open-source DAM, CMS, and PIM platform combining asset, content, and product management for mid-to-large enterprises in banking, insurance, and retail.
A team file library billed as a flat monthly fee with unlimited users, aimed at organisations where most people only need to download an approved file a few times a month.
Price published
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Billed on
Flat price per account by storage; users are unlimited
Flat price per account by volume; the vendor states there are no per-user fees
Cloud service: billed by storage capacity (GB) plus which optional modules you select; user accounts are unlimited/uncapped. No public price list — pricing is obtained via a configurator/calculator or by requesting a quote. On-premise/hosted deployments use Free, Standard, and Enterprise license editions (feature-gated), also quote-only. A non-commercial Free Edition exists with no disclosed price.
Flat price per account — users are not a billing unit
Deployment
On-premise, Cloud
Cloud, On-premise
Cloud, On-premise
Cloud
Free plan
Yes
Yes
No
No
Free trial
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Transparency index
100%
90%
Not checked
70%
Most common complaint
A ten per cent price rise is announced for 1 September 2026
On-premise is available only in the enterprise tier, whose price is not published
Not checked
Storage ceilings are modest next to enterprise platforms, so large video libraries outgrow the tiers quickly