Verdict
An open-source PHP/Symfony platform unifying PIM, DAM, CMS and MDM on one codebase, for teams with in-house developers or an integrator partner rather than a marketing team wanting to self-serve.
A cloud portfolio and image-storage platform for individual photographers, with client galleries and built-in print/licensing sales.
A developer-facing image and video transformation API and CDN, billed from one pooled credit balance covering storage, transformations and bandwidth together.
A DAM offered as both cloud and on-premise, aimed at small-to-mid teams that want fast metadata-driven search over large asset libraries and want files to stay on their own infrastructure.
Price published
Yes
No
Yes
No
Billed on
Annual licence per edition, not per user
Quote-only. Priced per named "Library Seat" (2-5 seats depending on tier, custom for Enterprise) plus a storage allotment per tier (1TB-5TB, custom for Enterprise) and a cap on "Advanced Integrations" (0 to unlimited). Unlimited invited/contributor users and unlimited Social Content Publisher seats included on all/most tiers. Annual or monthly billing toggle shown on the pricing page, but no dollar amounts are published — all tiers show a "Get Pricing" CTA to a demo/sales call.
Credits: one credit is 1,000 transformations, or 1 GB of storage, or 1 GB of video bandwidth
Annual subscription covering all features, integrations, updates and support
Deployment
On-premise, Cloud
Cloud
Cloud
Cloud, On-premise
Free plan
Yes
No
Yes
No
Free trial
No
No
Yes
No
Transparency index
100%
Not checked
60%
30%
Most common complaint
It is a broader platform than a DAM — some capability has to be built rather than switched on
Not checked
Prices are published for the API but not for the DAM, so the product being compared with a DAM still has no price
Like the platforms it competes with, it asks for a form submission before naming a price