Verdict
An open-source PHP/Symfony platform unifying PIM, DAM, CMS and MDM on one codebase, for teams with in-house developers or an integrator partner rather than a marketing team wanting to self-serve.
A cloud DAM billed by storage and configuration rather than seat count, aimed at agencies and distributed marketing teams with large or growing user bases where per-seat pricing would balloon.
An image and video API for real-time resizing, compression, and format conversion via URL parameters, built for developers at ecommerce, media, and agency teams.
An on-prem, cloud or hybrid DAM aimed at likely DACH-region enterprise manufacturers who need to keep data in-house, with a public review record too thin to lean on without running your own trial.
Price published
Yes
No
Yes
No
Billed on
Annual licence per edition, not per user
Not per user — the vendor states unlimited users and permission groups
Consumption-based credits, sold in monthly tiers ($25–$500/mo self-serve, custom above that). Credits are spent on Management (2 credits/GB/month for stored assets), Delivery (1 credit/GB bandwidth), and Transformation (variable by operation). Per-credit rate drops as plan tier rises ($0.25 down to $0.12, monthly billing; slightly cheaper on annual commitment). Each plan also states an implied storage/bandwidth cap in GB.
Quoted per customer
Deployment
On-premise, Cloud
Cloud
Cloud
On-premise, Cloud, Hybrid
Free plan
Yes
No
No
No
Free trial
No
No
No
No
Transparency index
100%
20%
Not checked
20%
Most common complaint
It is a broader platform than a DAM — some capability has to be built rather than switched on
The promise not to charge per user is prominent, but there is no figure to compare it against
Not checked
No prices, though it does name three deployment models including fully managed on-premise