Verdict
A self-hosted, single-container photo indexer under AGPL/commercial licensing, for people who want a private on-hardware archive without Google-Photos-level AI tagging or mobile app polish.
A developer-facing image and video transformation API and CDN, billed from one pooled credit balance covering storage, transformations and bandwidth together.
A cloud portfolio and image-storage platform for individual photographers, with client galleries and built-in print/licensing sales.
An enterprise headless CMS and composable DXP for developer-led teams needing multi-channel content delivery, with a native asset-management module that's newer and thinly reviewed.
Price published
Yes
Yes
No
No
Billed on
Subscription per edition, billed annually
Credits: one credit is 1,000 transformations, or 1 GB of storage, or 1 GB of video bandwidth
Quote-only. Priced per named "Library Seat" (2-5 seats depending on tier, custom for Enterprise) plus a storage allotment per tier (1TB-5TB, custom for Enterprise) and a cap on "Advanced Integrations" (0 to unlimited). Unlimited invited/contributor users and unlimited Social Content Publisher seats included on all/most tiers. Annual or monthly billing toggle shown on the pricing page, but no dollar amounts are published — all tiers show a "Get Pricing" CTA to a demo/sales call.
Quoted per customer
Deployment
On-premise, Cloud
Cloud
Cloud
Cloud
Free plan
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Free trial
No
Yes
No
No
Transparency index
100%
60%
Not checked
30%
Most common complaint
The gap between the free edition and the first paid one is wide: €200 a month
Prices are published for the API but not for the DAM, so the product being compared with a DAM still has no price
Not checked
A free start exists, but the terms for moving to a paid tier are not on the page