Verdict
A self-hosted, single-container photo indexer under AGPL/commercial licensing, for people who want a private on-hardware archive without Google-Photos-level AI tagging or mobile app polish.
A PIM platform with a built-in DAM module, used by manufacturing and ecommerce companies to manage product data and assets; also available as a free open-source Community Edition.
An enterprise headless CMS and composable DXP for developer-led teams needing multi-channel content delivery, with a native asset-management module that's newer and thinly reviewed.
A DAM offered as both cloud and on-premise, aimed at small-to-mid teams that want fast metadata-driven search over large asset libraries and want files to stay on their own infrastructure.
Price published
Yes
No
No
No
Billed on
Subscription per edition, billed annually
No genuine dollar pricing is published. The vendor's package-comparison page lists four tiers: Community Edition (free, open-source, self-hosted), Growth (SaaS, shown only as "Starting at $0 Annually" with a free-trial CTA — no real recurring price disclosed), Advanced and Premium (both "Call for a quote"). No billing unit (per user, per SKU, per asset, per GB) is stated anywhere on the site for the paid tiers.
Quoted per customer
Annual subscription covering all features, integrations, updates and support
Deployment
On-premise, Cloud
Cloud, On-premise
Cloud
Cloud, On-premise
Free plan
Yes
No
Yes
No
Free trial
No
No
No
No
Transparency index
100%
Not checked
30%
30%
Most common complaint
The gap between the free edition and the first paid one is wide: €200 a month
Not checked
A free start exists, but the terms for moving to a paid tier are not on the page
Like the platforms it competes with, it asks for a form submission before naming a price