Verdict
A self-hosted file-sync and collaboration platform some organisations stretch into asset-library duty; tagging, batch metadata editing and dynamic tag-based collections are still limited or missing.
A template-driven creative-automation platform for producing localized video and banner ad variants at scale, with asset storage bundled in rather than offered as a standalone DAM.
An open-source DAM, CMS, and PIM platform combining asset, content, and product management for mid-to-large enterprises in banking, insurance, and retail.
An image and video CDN with an API-first asset library, built for fast developer integration, billed on flat monthly tiers with per-GB overage once bandwidth or storage limits are exceeded.
Price published
Yes
No
No
Yes
Billed on
Subscription per user per year, cheaper at volume
The set of modules required
Cloud service: billed by storage capacity (GB) plus which optional modules you select; user accounts are unlimited/uncapped. No public price list — pricing is obtained via a configurator/calculator or by requesting a quote. On-premise/hosted deployments use Free, Standard, and Enterprise license editions (feature-gated), also quote-only. A non-commercial Free Edition exists with no disclosed price.
Bandwidth, storage and user seats, with published per-unit rates above the limits
Deployment
On-premise, Cloud
Cloud
Cloud, On-premise
Cloud
Free plan
Yes
No
No
Yes
Free trial
No
No
No
Yes
Transparency index
80%
10%
Not checked
70%
Most common complaint
It is a file platform with DAM features rather than a DAM: asset-level metadata and rights are thinner
Both lines are marked price on application with no ranges
Not checked
Several units are metered at once: bandwidth, storage, video units and seats