Verdict
A cloud DAM billed by storage and configuration rather than seat count, aimed at agencies and distributed marketing teams with large or growing user bases where per-seat pricing would balloon.
An open-source PHP/Symfony platform unifying PIM, DAM, CMS and MDM on one codebase, for teams with in-house developers or an integrator partner rather than a marketing team wanting to self-serve.
A digital asset management platform for enterprises, agencies, museums, and nonprofits, paired with in-house consulting and data-migration services.
A flat-fee-per-account DAM and MAM with a free 500GB/5-user tier and unlimited paid users, for teams willing to pilot without much recent independent review evidence.
Price published
No
Yes
No
Yes
Billed on
Not per user — the vendor states unlimited users and permission groups
Annual licence per edition, not per user
Not disclosed publicly. Plans are differentiated by number of admin users, storage (TB), and number of portals (e.g. Essential: 5 admin users/1TB; Signature: 20 admin users/2TB/3 portals; Premium: 50 admin users/5TB/5 portals); exact per-unit or per-tier prices are not published, visitors must request a consult.
Flat price per account by volume; the vendor states there are no per-user fees
Deployment
Cloud
On-premise, Cloud
Cloud, On-premise, Hybrid
Cloud, On-premise
Free plan
No
Yes
No
Yes
Free trial
No
No
No
Yes
Transparency index
20%
100%
Not checked
90%
Most common complaint
The promise not to charge per user is prominent, but there is no figure to compare it against
It is a broader platform than a DAM — some capability has to be built rather than switched on
Not checked
On-premise is available only in the enterprise tier, whose price is not published