Verdict
An image and video CDN with an API-first asset library, built for fast developer integration, billed on flat monthly tiers with per-GB overage once bandwidth or storage limits are exceeded.
A DAM offered as both cloud and on-premise, aimed at small-to-mid teams that want fast metadata-driven search over large asset libraries and want files to stay on their own infrastructure.
An image and video API for real-time resizing, compression, and format conversion via URL parameters, built for developers at ecommerce, media, and agency teams.
An on-prem, cloud or hybrid DAM aimed at likely DACH-region enterprise manufacturers who need to keep data in-house, with a public review record too thin to lean on without running your own trial.
Price published
Yes
No
Yes
No
Billed on
Bandwidth, storage and user seats, with published per-unit rates above the limits
Annual subscription covering all features, integrations, updates and support
Consumption-based credits, sold in monthly tiers ($25–$500/mo self-serve, custom above that). Credits are spent on Management (2 credits/GB/month for stored assets), Delivery (1 credit/GB bandwidth), and Transformation (variable by operation). Per-credit rate drops as plan tier rises ($0.25 down to $0.12, monthly billing; slightly cheaper on annual commitment). Each plan also states an implied storage/bandwidth cap in GB.
Quoted per customer
Deployment
Cloud
Cloud, On-premise
Cloud
On-premise, Cloud, Hybrid
Free plan
Yes
No
No
No
Free trial
Yes
No
No
No
Transparency index
70%
30%
Not checked
20%
Most common complaint
Several units are metered at once: bandwidth, storage, video units and seats
Like the platforms it competes with, it asks for a form submission before naming a price
Not checked
No prices, though it does name three deployment models including fully managed on-premise