Verdict
A developer-facing image and video transformation API and CDN, billed from one pooled credit balance covering storage, transformations and bandwidth together.
A self-hosted file-sync and collaboration platform some organisations stretch into asset-library duty; tagging, batch metadata editing and dynamic tag-based collections are still limited or missing.
Not checked
A brand-management platform built around a single, always-current source of truth for guidelines, logos and templates, aimed at brand teams working with internal staff and external agencies.
Price published
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Billed on
Credits: one credit is 1,000 transformations, or 1 GB of storage, or 1 GB of video bandwidth
Subscription per user per year, cheaper at volume
Tiered plans priced by SKU (product) count, not by user seat — all plans include unlimited user seats. Each tier also caps monthly AI credits, API calls/hour, and DAM file storage + CDN traffic (GB/month). Standard is free (500 SKUs, 50GB storage); Pro is $499/mo (50,000 SKUs, 750GB storage); Enterprise is custom/quote-only (unlimited SKUs, custom storage). Optional flat-fee add-ons (Product Feeds $300/mo, Brand Portals $300/mo, Product Data Sheets $200/mo) and one-time onboarding fees ($0 / $3,000 / custom).
Monthly active users
Deployment
Cloud
On-premise, Cloud
Cloud
Cloud
Free plan
Yes
Yes
No
No
Free trial
Yes
No
No
No
Transparency index
60%
80%
Not checked
30%
Most common complaint
Prices are published for the API but not for the DAM, so the product being compared with a DAM still has no price
It is a file platform with DAM features rather than a DAM: asset-level metadata and rights are thinner
Not checked
The MAU model favours occasional users, but there is no figure to verify that with