Verdict
A brand-guidelines and asset portal for mid-market marketing teams, with a genuine free tier that covers a branded guidelines page but not the full asset library or workflow tools.
A self-hosted file-sync and collaboration platform some organisations stretch into asset-library duty; tagging, batch metadata editing and dynamic tag-based collections are still limited or missing.
An open-source DAM, CMS, and PIM platform combining asset, content, and product management for mid-to-large enterprises in banking, insurance, and retail.
A self-hosted, permission-based photo/video catalog with album hierarchies, tagging and a large plugin ecosystem, for archives and small orgs willing to maintain their own server as the library grows.
Price published
No
Yes
No
Yes
Billed on
Number of users and the tier selected
Subscription per user per year, cheaper at volume
Cloud service: billed by storage capacity (GB) plus which optional modules you select; user accounts are unlimited/uncapped. No public price list — pricing is obtained via a configurator/calculator or by requesting a quote. On-premise/hosted deployments use Free, Standard, and Enterprise license editions (feature-gated), also quote-only. A non-commercial Free Edition exists with no disclosed price.
Flat price per account by storage; users are unlimited
Deployment
Cloud
On-premise, Cloud
Cloud, On-premise
On-premise, Cloud
Free plan
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Free trial
No
No
No
Yes
Transparency index
40%
80%
Not checked
100%
Most common complaint
The free tier is named while the cost of the next step is not
It is a file platform with DAM features rather than a DAM: asset-level metadata and rights are thinner
Not checked
A ten per cent price rise is announced for 1 September 2026