Verdict
A visually organized, board-based DAM for photo/image-heavy creative and marketing teams, with a genuinely usable free tier and a history of shifting, steep paid-tier pricing.
An on-prem, cloud or hybrid DAM aimed at likely DACH-region enterprise manufacturers who need to keep data in-house, with a public review record too thin to lean on without running your own trial.
A PIM platform with a built-in DAM module, used by manufacturing and ecommerce companies to manage product data and assets; also available as a free open-source Community Edition.
A team file library billed as a flat monthly fee with unlimited users, aimed at organisations where most people only need to download an approved file a few times a month.
Price published
No
No
No
Yes
Billed on
Credits; users are not billed
Quoted per customer
No genuine dollar pricing is published. The vendor's package-comparison page lists four tiers: Community Edition (free, open-source, self-hosted), Growth (SaaS, shown only as "Starting at $0 Annually" with a free-trial CTA — no real recurring price disclosed), Advanced and Premium (both "Call for a quote"). No billing unit (per user, per SKU, per asset, per GB) is stated anywhere on the site for the paid tiers.
Flat price per account — users are not a billing unit
Deployment
Cloud
On-premise, Cloud, Hybrid
Cloud, On-premise
Cloud
Free plan
Yes
No
No
No
Free trial
Yes
No
No
Yes
Transparency index
60%
20%
Not checked
70%
Most common complaint
The free tier is described in detail while the paid tiers are named only
No prices, though it does name three deployment models including fully managed on-premise
Not checked
Storage ceilings are modest next to enterprise platforms, so large video libraries outgrow the tiers quickly