Verdict
An open-source PHP/Symfony platform unifying PIM, DAM, CMS and MDM on one codebase, for teams with in-house developers or an integrator partner rather than a marketing team wanting to self-serve.
A cloud DAM billed by storage and configuration rather than seat count, aimed at agencies and distributed marketing teams with large or growing user bases where per-seat pricing would balloon.
A digital asset management platform for enterprises, agencies, museums, and nonprofits, paired with in-house consulting and data-migration services.
A developer-facing image and video transformation API and CDN, billed from one pooled credit balance covering storage, transformations and bandwidth together.
Price published
Yes
No
No
Yes
Billed on
Annual licence per edition, not per user
Not per user — the vendor states unlimited users and permission groups
Not disclosed publicly. Plans are differentiated by number of admin users, storage (TB), and number of portals (e.g. Essential: 5 admin users/1TB; Signature: 20 admin users/2TB/3 portals; Premium: 50 admin users/5TB/5 portals); exact per-unit or per-tier prices are not published, visitors must request a consult.
Credits: one credit is 1,000 transformations, or 1 GB of storage, or 1 GB of video bandwidth
Deployment
On-premise, Cloud
Cloud
Cloud, On-premise, Hybrid
Cloud
Free plan
Yes
No
No
Yes
Free trial
No
No
No
Yes
Transparency index
100%
20%
Not checked
60%
Most common complaint
It is a broader platform than a DAM — some capability has to be built rather than switched on
The promise not to charge per user is prominent, but there is no figure to compare it against
Not checked
Prices are published for the API but not for the DAM, so the product being compared with a DAM still has no price