Verdict
A self-hosted file-sync and collaboration platform some organisations stretch into asset-library duty; tagging, batch metadata editing and dynamic tag-based collections are still limited or missing.
Not checked
A developer-facing image and video transformation API and CDN, billed from one pooled credit balance covering storage, transformations and bandwidth together.
A Windows-only photo cataloging tool for large image libraries (50,000+ files), built by a single developer, sold as a one-time perpetual licence instead of a subscription.
Price published
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Billed on
Subscription per user per year, cheaper at volume
Tiered plans priced by SKU (product) count, not by user seat — all plans include unlimited user seats. Each tier also caps monthly AI credits, API calls/hour, and DAM file storage + CDN traffic (GB/month). Standard is free (500 SKUs, 50GB storage); Pro is $499/mo (50,000 SKUs, 750GB storage); Enterprise is custom/quote-only (unlimited SKUs, custom storage). Optional flat-fee add-ons (Product Feeds $300/mo, Brand Portals $300/mo, Product Data Sheets $200/mo) and one-time onboarding fees ($0 / $3,000 / custom).
Credits: one credit is 1,000 transformations, or 1 GB of storage, or 1 GB of video bandwidth
Perpetual licence, no subscription
Deployment
On-premise, Cloud
Cloud
Cloud
On-premise
Free plan
Yes
No
Yes
No
Free trial
No
No
Yes
Yes
Transparency index
80%
Not checked
60%
60%
Most common complaint
It is a file platform with DAM features rather than a DAM: asset-level metadata and rights are thinner
Not checked
Prices are published for the API but not for the DAM, so the product being compared with a DAM still has no price
Windows only, so it is out of the question for a team on Macs