Verdict
A Windows-only photo cataloging tool for large image libraries (50,000+ files), built by a single developer, sold as a one-time perpetual licence instead of a subscription.
A cloud DAM billed by storage and configuration rather than seat count, aimed at agencies and distributed marketing teams with large or growing user bases where per-seat pricing would balloon.
An open-source DAM, CMS, and PIM platform combining asset, content, and product management for mid-to-large enterprises in banking, insurance, and retail.
A DAM offered as both cloud and on-premise, aimed at small-to-mid teams that want fast metadata-driven search over large asset libraries and want files to stay on their own infrastructure.
Price published
No
No
No
No
Billed on
Perpetual licence, no subscription
Not per user — the vendor states unlimited users and permission groups
Cloud service: billed by storage capacity (GB) plus which optional modules you select; user accounts are unlimited/uncapped. No public price list — pricing is obtained via a configurator/calculator or by requesting a quote. On-premise/hosted deployments use Free, Standard, and Enterprise license editions (feature-gated), also quote-only. A non-commercial Free Edition exists with no disclosed price.
Annual subscription covering all features, integrations, updates and support
Deployment
On-premise
Cloud
Cloud, On-premise
Cloud, On-premise
Free plan
No
No
No
No
Free trial
Yes
No
No
No
Transparency index
60%
20%
Not checked
30%
Most common complaint
Windows only, so it is out of the question for a team on Macs
The promise not to charge per user is prominent, but there is no figure to compare it against
Not checked
Like the platforms it competes with, it asks for a form submission before naming a price