Verdict
A DAM offered as both cloud and on-premise, aimed at small-to-mid teams that want fast metadata-driven search over large asset libraries and want files to stay on their own infrastructure.
An open-source PHP/Symfony platform unifying PIM, DAM, CMS and MDM on one codebase, for teams with in-house developers or an integrator partner rather than a marketing team wanting to self-serve.
A digital asset management platform for enterprises, agencies, museums, and nonprofits, paired with in-house consulting and data-migration services.
A cloud DAM billed by storage and configuration rather than seat count, aimed at agencies and distributed marketing teams with large or growing user bases where per-seat pricing would balloon.
Price published
No
Yes
No
No
Billed on
Annual subscription covering all features, integrations, updates and support
Annual licence per edition, not per user
Not disclosed publicly. Plans are differentiated by number of admin users, storage (TB), and number of portals (e.g. Essential: 5 admin users/1TB; Signature: 20 admin users/2TB/3 portals; Premium: 50 admin users/5TB/5 portals); exact per-unit or per-tier prices are not published, visitors must request a consult.
Not per user — the vendor states unlimited users and permission groups
Deployment
Cloud, On-premise
On-premise, Cloud
Cloud, On-premise, Hybrid
Cloud
Free plan
No
Yes
No
No
Free trial
No
No
No
No
Transparency index
30%
100%
Not checked
20%
Most common complaint
Like the platforms it competes with, it asks for a form submission before naming a price
It is a broader platform than a DAM — some capability has to be built rather than switched on
Not checked
The promise not to charge per user is prominent, but there is no figure to compare it against