Verdict
A DAM offered as both cloud and on-premise, aimed at small-to-mid teams that want fast metadata-driven search over large asset libraries and want files to stay on their own infrastructure.
An open-source PHP/Symfony platform unifying PIM, DAM, CMS and MDM on one codebase, for teams with in-house developers or an integrator partner rather than a marketing team wanting to self-serve.
A digital asset management platform for enterprises, agencies, museums, and nonprofits, paired with in-house consulting and data-migration services.
A team file library billed as a flat monthly fee with unlimited users, aimed at organisations where most people only need to download an approved file a few times a month.
Price published
No
Yes
No
Yes
Billed on
Annual subscription covering all features, integrations, updates and support
Annual licence per edition, not per user
Not disclosed publicly. Plans are differentiated by number of admin users, storage (TB), and number of portals (e.g. Essential: 5 admin users/1TB; Signature: 20 admin users/2TB/3 portals; Premium: 50 admin users/5TB/5 portals); exact per-unit or per-tier prices are not published, visitors must request a consult.
Flat price per account — users are not a billing unit
Deployment
Cloud, On-premise
On-premise, Cloud
Cloud, On-premise, Hybrid
Cloud
Free plan
No
Yes
No
No
Free trial
No
No
No
Yes
Transparency index
30%
100%
Not checked
70%
Most common complaint
Like the platforms it competes with, it asks for a form submission before naming a price
It is a broader platform than a DAM — some capability has to be built rather than switched on
Not checked
Storage ceilings are modest next to enterprise platforms, so large video libraries outgrow the tiers quickly