Verdict
A DAM offered as both cloud and on-premise, aimed at small-to-mid teams that want fast metadata-driven search over large asset libraries and want files to stay on their own infrastructure.
A disk-native photo cataloguer and batch editor sold as a one-off perpetual licence, for photographers with large libraries who don't need Lightroom/Capture One-level RAW editing.
A digital asset management platform for enterprises, agencies, museums, and nonprofits, paired with in-house consulting and data-migration services.
A developer-facing image and video transformation API and CDN, billed from one pooled credit balance covering storage, transformations and bandwidth together.
Price published
No
Yes
No
Yes
Billed on
Annual subscription covering all features, integrations, updates and support
One-off perpetual licence; a cloud subscription is sold separately
Not disclosed publicly. Plans are differentiated by number of admin users, storage (TB), and number of portals (e.g. Essential: 5 admin users/1TB; Signature: 20 admin users/2TB/3 portals; Premium: 50 admin users/5TB/5 portals); exact per-unit or per-tier prices are not published, visitors must request a consult.
Credits: one credit is 1,000 transformations, or 1 GB of storage, or 1 GB of video bandwidth
Deployment
Cloud, On-premise
On-premise
Cloud, On-premise, Hybrid
Cloud
Free plan
No
No
No
Yes
Free trial
No
Yes
No
Yes
Transparency index
30%
90%
Not checked
60%
Most common complaint
Like the platforms it competes with, it asks for a form submission before naming a price
The published prices are promotional and dated; list price is roughly double
Not checked
Prices are published for the API but not for the DAM, so the product being compared with a DAM still has no price