PicaJet

IntelligenceBank, ResourceSpace, Frontify

Side by side on what we have verified on each vendor’s own pages. Where a fact was not checked, the table says so rather than leaving a blank that reads as “no”.

What decides it · Runs on your own servers

If the files genuinely cannot leave your infrastructure, this is not a close race — the platforms marked No below should not be on the call at all.

IntelligenceBank

No

ResourceSpace

Yes

Frontify

No

Everything else

Verdict
Not checked
Not checked
Not checked
Price published
Yes
No
No
Billed on
Package, number and type of users, storage and add-ons
Self-hosted: no licence fee. Hosted: a user ceiling per tier
Monthly active users
Deployment
Cloud
Cloud, On-premise
Cloud
Free plan
No
Yes
No
Free trial
No
No
No
Transparency index
30%
60%
30%
Most common complaint
Only the floor of the base package is published; everything else is quoted
The free route is genuinely free of licence fees but moves hosting, upgrades and support onto you
The MAU model favours occasional users, but there is no figure to verify that with

“Not checked” means exactly that: we have not verified it, not that the platform lacks it. Every other value was read off the vendor’s own pages on the date shown on each platform page.

What to ask on the demo

One question per platform, drawn from what actually goes wrong with it — not a generic checklist. Vendors run the demo; this hands the agenda back to you.

IntelligenceBank Only the floor of the base package is published; everything else is quoted — ask them to answer this in writing before the trial.
ResourceSpace The free route is genuinely free of licence fees but moves hosting, upgrades and support onto you — ask them to answer this in writing before the trial.
Frontify The MAU model favours occasional users, but there is no figure to verify that with — ask them to answer this in writing before the trial.

No email required — the page prints as it stands.