PicaJet
Search Build shortlist

Dash, Amplience, Frontify

Side by side on what we have verified on each vendor’s own pages. Where a fact was not checked, the table says so rather than leaving a blank that reads as “no”.

What decides it · Publishes a price

One of these tells you the order of magnitude before you speak to anyone, and the others do not. That difference sets how long your evaluation takes, whatever the software does.

Dash

Yes

Amplience

No

Frontify

No

Everything else

Dash
Amplience
Frontify
Verdict
Not checked
Not checked
Not checked
Price published
Yes
No
No
Billed on
Flat price per account; users are unlimited, tier set by storage and downloads
Content volume, storage and depth of automation
Monthly active users
Deployment
Cloud
Cloud
Cloud
Free plan
No
No
No
Free trial
No
No
No
Transparency index
60%
10%
30%
Most common complaint
The tier is capped by download count as well as volume, which is a less familiar unit to budget against
Neither tiers nor ranges
The MAU model favours occasional users, but there is no figure to verify that with

“Not checked” means exactly that: we have not verified it, not that the platform lacks it. Every other value was read off the vendor’s own pages on the date shown on each platform page.

What to ask on the demo

One question per platform, drawn from what actually goes wrong with it — not a generic checklist. Vendors run the demo; this hands the agenda back to you.

Dash The tier is capped by download count as well as volume, which is a less familiar unit to budget against — ask them to answer this in writing before the trial.
Amplience Neither tiers nor ranges — ask them to answer this in writing before the trial.
Frontify The MAU model favours occasional users, but there is no figure to verify that with — ask them to answer this in writing before the trial.

No email required — the page prints as it stands.